Post by Colby Donaldson on May 7, 2010 23:15:05 GMT -5
I'm going to try and get my questions up tomorrow so i need to start preparing:
Points I want to make towards Todd:
Social mute who appeared to be an extra vote. Not in control of own votes. Call out on fact that 2 of his "moves" were things he didn't actually do and instead considered. What was his strategy this game? Though he claims he didn't come into game being UTR did he use this to his advantage or was it eventually instated as his official strategy?
Points I want to make towards Jessica:
Social butterfly who seems insincere. Manipulated to split vote between Todd and Stephenie and also convinced to vote me out the week i left. Needs to stop taking credit for other people's work. Seems Kenny pulled her strings all game up until final 3. Relied heavily on idols from other people to stick around. Not a social manipulation to do so because it was SMART to keep her around because it meant a bigger target left in the game.
Questions for both:
Why do you deserve to win over the other person. Why DOESN'T the other person deserve to win. How much control over the game did you have over what was being done, boot order, etc? Did they employ any strategy to either keep target off self or purposely keep target on self to somehow control the flow of the game? If they could be final 2 with anyone else in this game who would it be? Any regrets?
Followup:
Since I'm asking them to discuss why the *other* person doesn't deserve to win it's only fair they be allowed to defend self. I would appreciate it if they took the time to clarify anything they are being attacked about (either by a juror or in response to part of my question).
^that's the skeleton of what I want to ask. Still need Jessica's answers to JT and nat.
Points I want to make towards Todd:
Social mute who appeared to be an extra vote. Not in control of own votes. Call out on fact that 2 of his "moves" were things he didn't actually do and instead considered. What was his strategy this game? Though he claims he didn't come into game being UTR did he use this to his advantage or was it eventually instated as his official strategy?
Points I want to make towards Jessica:
Social butterfly who seems insincere. Manipulated to split vote between Todd and Stephenie and also convinced to vote me out the week i left. Needs to stop taking credit for other people's work. Seems Kenny pulled her strings all game up until final 3. Relied heavily on idols from other people to stick around. Not a social manipulation to do so because it was SMART to keep her around because it meant a bigger target left in the game.
Questions for both:
Why do you deserve to win over the other person. Why DOESN'T the other person deserve to win. How much control over the game did you have over what was being done, boot order, etc? Did they employ any strategy to either keep target off self or purposely keep target on self to somehow control the flow of the game? If they could be final 2 with anyone else in this game who would it be? Any regrets?
Followup:
Since I'm asking them to discuss why the *other* person doesn't deserve to win it's only fair they be allowed to defend self. I would appreciate it if they took the time to clarify anything they are being attacked about (either by a juror or in response to part of my question).
^that's the skeleton of what I want to ask. Still need Jessica's answers to JT and nat.
